Skip to main content

Scattering In Quantum Mechanics

Scattering Amplitude 
Spinless Particle

 we are dealing with quantum description of scattering. 
  • Elastic Scattering $ \rightarrow $ between two spinless, non-relativistic particles of masses m1 and m2. During the scattering process, the particles interact with one another. If the interaction is time independent, we can describe the two-particle system with stationary states.

  1.  \begin{equation}\Psi\left(\vec{r}_{1}, \vec{r}_{2}, t\right)=\psi\left(\vec{r}_{1}, \vec{r}_{2}\right) e^{-i E_{T} t / n}\end{equation} 
$ E_T $ is total energy.
 \begin{equation}\left[-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2 m_{1}} \vec{\nabla}_{1}^{2}-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2 m_{2}} \vec{\nabla}_{2}^{2}+\hat{V}\left(\vec{r}_{1}, \vec{r}_{2}\right)\right] \psi\left(\vec{r}_{1}, \vec{r}_{2}\right)=E_{T} \psi\left(\vec{r}_{1}, \vec{r}_{2}\right) \end{equation}
  
 defining $ r= \mid \vec{r_1}- \vec{r_2}\mid \implies V(r_1, r_2) = V(r)$ 
 and hence this makes the two body problem as to two decoupled eigenvalue problems: one for the center of mass (CM), which moves like a free particle of mass $M=m_{1}+m_{2}$ and which is of no concern to us here, and another for a fictitious particle with a reduced mass $\mu=m_{1} m_{2} /\left(m_{1}+m_{2}\right)$ which mores in the potential $\hat{V}(r)$ 

\begin{equation}\label{wave} -\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2 \mu} \vec{\nabla}^{2} \psi(\vec{r})+\hat{V}(r) \psi(\vec{r})=E \psi(\vec{r})\end{equation}

The problem thus reduced to solve this equation. we need to connect differential cross section in the CM frame can be obtained from an asymptotic form of the solution of Differential equation. Its solutions can then be used to calculate the probability per unit solid angle per unit time that the particle $\mu$ is scattered into a solid angle $d \Omega$ in the direction $(\theta, \varphi) ;$ this probability is given by the differential cross section $d \sigma / d \Omega$. In quantum mechanics the incident particle is described by means of a wave packet that interacts with the target. The incident wave packet must be spatially large so that spreading during the experiment is not appreciable. It must be large compared to the target's size and yet small compared to the size of the Lab so that it does not overlap simultaneously with the target and detector. After scattering, the wave function consists of an unscattered part propagating in the forward direction and a scattered part that propagates along some direction $(\theta, \varphi)$ We can view  as representing the scattering of a particle of mass $\mu$ from a fixed scattering center that is described by $V(r),$ where $r$ is the distance from the particle $\mu$ to the center of $V(r) .$ We assume that $V(r)$ has a finite range $a$. Thus the interaction between the particle and the potential occurs only in a limited region of space $r \leq a$, which is called the range of $V(r),$ or the scattering region. Outside the range, $r>a$, the potential vanishes, $V(r)=0 ;$ the eigenvalue problem then becomes \[ \left(\nabla^{2}+k_{0}^{2}\right) \phi_{i n c}(\vec{r})=0 \] where $k_{0}^{2}=2 \mu E / \hbar^{2} .$ In this case $\mu$ behaves as a free particle before collision and hence can be described by a plane wave \[ \phi_{i n c}(\vec{r})=A e^{i \vec{k}_{0} \cdot \vec{r}} \] where $\vec{k}_{0}$ is the wave vector associated with the incident particle and $A$ is a normalization factor. Thus, prior to the interaction with the target, the particles of the incident beam are independent of each other; they move like free particles, each with a momentum $\vec{p}=\hbar \vec{k}_{0}$


(a) Angle between the incident and scattered wave vectors $\vec{k}_{0}$ and $\vec{k}$.
(b) Incident and scattered waves: the incident wave is a plane wave, $\phi_{i n c}(\vec{r})=A e^{i \vec{k}_0 \cdot \vec{r}},$ and the scattered wave, $\phi_{s c}(\vec{r})=A f(\theta, \varphi) \frac{e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}}}{r},$ is an outgoing wave.

When the incident wave collides or interacts with the target, an outgoing wave $\phi_{s c}(\vec{r})$ is scattered out. In the case of an isotropic scattering, the scattered wave is spherically symmetric, having the form $e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}} / r .$ In general, however, the scattered wave is not spherically symmetric; its amplitude depends on the direction $(\theta, \varphi)$ along which it is detected and hence \begin{equation}\phi_{s c}(\vec{r})=A f(\theta, \varphi) \frac{e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}}}{r}\end{equation} where $f(\theta, \varphi)$ is called the scattering amplitude, $\vec{k}$ is the wave vector associated with the scattered particle, and $\theta$ is the angle between $\vec{k}_{0}$ and $\vec{k}$ as displayed in Figure 1. a. After the scattering has taken place (Figure $1 \mathrm{b}$ ), the total wave consists of a superposition of the incident plane wave and the scattered wave: \begin{equation}\psi(\vec{r})=\phi_{i n c}(\vec{r})+\phi_{s c}(\vec{r}) \simeq A\left[e^{i \vec{k}_{0} \cdot \vec{r}}+f(\theta, \varphi) \frac{e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}}}{r}\right]\end{equation} We now need to determine $f(\theta, \varphi)$ and $d \sigma / d \Omega .$ 

Scattering Amplitude and Differential Cross Section

 In order to find the $ f(\theta , \varphi), $ we need to take into account flux densities. \begin{equation}\begin{aligned} \vec{J}_{\text {inc}} &=\frac{i \hbar}{2 \mu}\left(\phi_{\text {inc}} \vec{\nabla} \phi_{\text {inc}}^{*}-\phi_{\text {inc}}^{*} \vec{\nabla} \phi_{\text {inc}}\right) \\ \overrightarrow{J_{s c}} &=\frac{i \hbar}{2 \mu}\left(\phi_{s c} \vec{\nabla} \phi_{s c}^{*}-\phi_{s c}^{*} \vec{\nabla} \phi_{s c}\right) \end{aligned}\end{equation}

Putting $ \phi_{i n c} \; \& \; \phi_{sc} $ and we will get ,
 
 \begin{equation}J_{i n c}=|A|^{2} \frac{\hbar k_{0}}{\mu}, \quad J_{s c}=|A|^{2} \frac{\hbar k}{\mu r^{2}}|f(\theta, \varphi)|^{2}\end{equation}
Now, we may recall that the number $d N(\theta, \varphi)$ of particles scattered into an element of solid angle $d \Omega$ in the direction $(\theta, \varphi)$ and passing through a surface element $d A=r^{2} d \Omega$ per unit time 
 
 \begin{equation}d N(\theta, \varphi)=J_{S C} r^{2} d \Omega\end{equation}
 
 \begin{equation}\frac{d N}{d \Omega}=J_{s c} r^{2}=|A|^{2} \frac{\hbar k}{\mu}|f(\theta, \varphi)|^{2}\end{equation}

 Note: The number of particles scattered into an element of solid angle $d \Omega(d \Omega=\sin \theta d \theta d \varphi)$ : the differential cross section which is $d \sigma(\theta, \varphi) / d \Omega,$ is defined as the number of particles scattered into an element of solid angle $d \Omega$ in the direction $(\theta, \varphi)$ per unit time and incident flux: \[ \frac{d \sigma(\theta, \varphi)}{d \Omega}=\frac{1}{J_{i n c}} \frac{d N(\theta, \varphi)}{d \Omega} \] where $J_{i n c}$ is equal to the number of incident particles per area per unit time.

Now, Therefore we have \begin{equation}\frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega}=\frac{1}{J_{i n c}} \frac{d N}{d \Omega}=\frac{k}{k_{0}}|f(\theta, \varphi)|^{2}\end{equation} For elastic scattering $k_{0} = k $ hence reduces to \begin{equation} \boxed{\frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega}=|f(\theta, \varphi)|^{2}} \end{equation} Our job is to find the $ f(\theta, \varphi) $ and this will solve our problem. To do that we need to use the Green's Function.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MY ART WORK

Passionate Teacher

The mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher inspires. ’ A teacher has the power to transform souls and touch someone’s life in a positive way. It is one of the noblest of professions that deal with life-changing and destiny-altering powers. The teacher has the present as raw material on which she will finally carve and design the future … the children. It’s an ever evolving yet challenging and lifelong learning environment of which we are an integral part. Teaching is a chance to touch someone’s life in a positive way. Teachers are the pillars of society for they educate and mould the future citizens of a country. Teaching, like any other activity, emerges from ones inwardness. Motivating and exciting students is the key. Passion for teaching is innate. At the core of caring relationships are positive and high expectations that not only structure and guide behaviours, but also challenge students to perform what they believ

You are here not because of your future but past.

PHILOSOPHY OF LIFE ______________________________________________________________ Saddam Leonardo Kap ________________________________________________________________________ You are here not because of your future but past.   _____________________________________________________ T he thing that I want to share is, let’s understand it by an example. Suppose you are A, and in past, u had a relationship with B. Now in present u have an amazing and lifelong relationship with C. Now what do u think at this point is, the relationship with B was lousy, it was meant to have vanished, and it was terrible. It happens well that that relationship never worked out. I am now too happy and I will not repeat that mistake. I want to throw that relationship as if I was sick of it like it was a dark era or something like the worst thing ever happened. Now let me stop this here and give you some deep insight into that relationship at that time. In present moment whatever you are, in